contextual analysis: many items that were in the original building program were not actually built in the final studio space due to the project being over budget. some of those items like display boards we really still need.
users/needs: students want better spacial planning in the overall studio space, as well as improving the acoustics and presentation areas (pin up, whiteboard, and digital). we want more places to display our work because that keeps us inspired more than anything.
social/behavioral factors: when we first started in this program, everyone said they were more inspired by the IARc studio and the Gatewood Studio Arts Building than any other school they visited. after using the space for a while, we all have gripes. so it is time to make some changes to OUR space. WE need to create this space and leave a legacy.
precedent studies: all the images we found of studios, offices, and computer labs show flexible, open, and interactive spaces are more inspiring environments to learn and work in than those that are divided and unorganized. energy sources that are mobile were also a very important discovery because of the electrical outlets in the floor being such an annoyance and hazard.
other activities: the IARc studio and the lobby of the Gatewood building are large spaces that are perfect for gatherings, networking events, and for rental purposes. expanding on how to maximize these spaces should be explored.
precedent studies: all the images we found of studios, offices, and computer labs show flexible, open, and interactive spaces are more inspiring environments to learn and work in than those that are divided and unorganized. energy sources that are mobile were also a very important discovery because of the electrical outlets in the floor being such an annoyance and hazard.
other activities: the IARc studio and the lobby of the Gatewood building are large spaces that are perfect for gatherings, networking events, and for rental purposes. expanding on how to maximize these spaces should be explored.
teaching pedagogies: hearing feedback from faculty and staff was helpful since they have used this space longer than us and have different needs than students. their suggested improvements: acoustical meeting area, open studio - flexible and adaptable over time, inclusive communal area enhanced by technology, flexibility in display
_________________________________________________________
When we first started talking about this project, I wanted to design a modern style rocking chair for the 'cozy corner' we are hoping to get.
_________________________________________________________
When we first started talking about this project, I wanted to design a modern style rocking chair for the 'cozy corner' we are hoping to get.
designed by: Toby Howes
designed by: Tendo MokkoAfter researching other studio spaces and coming across this quiet pod (can go anywhere in an open space) I think anything that helps with the acoustical issues we have is a greater need than a rocking chair. I was thinking the quiet pod would be small and for just a few students to use at a time.
But when I read Judy Smith's response to the staff interviews, maybe I should design a quiet room instead. "The acoustical quality in the space was an unknown in the design phase of the project. The need for acoustical support in the studios is apparent. The creation of meeting areas, possibly a room within a room, where faculty and student could meet for discussion would greatly assist with the acoustical challenges of the studio space. The meeting areas would benefit the exchange of information and foster a greater sense of community."
If we can't hear what people are saying, we are missing valuable information. I will explore what need is greater, spaces for individuals to have a guaranteed quiet moment, or a space that can provide the whole community with that guaranteed quiet moment.
